The collision repair industry, including the Automotive Service Association (ASA) and Society of Collision Repair Specialists (SCRS) united with the automotive industry to oppose the model act.
ASA said its members have been contacting state legislators who serve on the committee asking them to oppose the proposed model act. Committee members first accepted an amendment that stated “certified aftermarket crash parts shall be presumed to be capable of restoring a vehicle to its pre-loss condition.” This amendment was offered by state Rep. Brian Kennedy, D-R.I. ASA opposed the Kennedy amendment; the amendment passed by one vote. The Property and Casualty Insurance Committee followed by defeating the Model Parts act.
"During the hearing in D.C., and in the days leading up to it, SCRS and our partners in opposition to the model became increasingly convinced that we had the necessary support from the committee members to put this issue to rest once-and-for-all," said SCRS Executive Director Aaron Schulenburg. "Given our confidence in the legislators on the committee during this meeting, we didn't want to risk that the amendments could delay a final vote by creating additional discussion over the proposed language." Once the additional amendments were removed from consideration, the committee called for an up-and-down vote on the model, which resulted in the vote to oppose, and the conclusion of several years spent discussing this topic within NCOIL.
Robert L. Redding Jr., ASA’s Washington, D.C., representative, spoke on behalf of ASA at the NCOIL meeting on Capitol Hill, highlighting provisions found harmful by the ASA Collision Division Operations Committee.
In a letter released last week, signed by ASA, SCRS and a coalition of other national associations representing automakers, dealers, and repair constituents, the NCOIL P&C Committee was urged to oppose the overall model in totality. In addition to the five primary signatories, SCRS also worked to include more than 35 additional state and national collision repair associations who endorsed the content of the letter provided to legislators, further demonstrating the widespread consensus within the industry.