Aftermarket parts bill withdrawn in Maryland

March 28, 2016
The sponsor of a bill targeted at limiting insurer’s ability to require uncertified aftermarket parts has withdrawn the bill from the Maryland House of Delegates.

The sponsor of a bill targeted at limiting insurer’s ability to require uncertified aftermarket parts has withdrawn the bill from the Maryland House of Delegates.

House Bill 1258 would have prevented insurers from requiring the use of aftermarket collision parts during the first two years of a vehicle’s life unless the owner gave written consent. After two years, repairers would have been required to use only certified aftermarket parts unless they had written consent from the owner.

The bill called for the aftermarket parts certification entity to be a non-profit, nationally accredited developer of standards, which developed standards “in a consensus-based public forum that allows for public comment.”

On March 18, the Property and Casualty Subcommittee voted down the bill after a contentious hearing. Its sponsor, former body shop owner Richard Impallaria (R.-Baltimore), withdrew the bill from further consideration.

During the hearing, Impallaria sparred with LKQ government affairs representative Ray Colas after a display in which bill proponents demonstrated that an aftermarket bumper reinforcement bar from LKQ differed significantly from its OEM counterpart.

The Washington Metropolitan Auto Body Association and CAPA worked together on the bill language. The Maryland Automobile Dealers Association also supported the bill.

The insurance industry opposed the bill, as did LKQ, NSF and the Auto Body Parts Association.

According to the Property Casualty Insurers Association of America (PCI), the bill would have increased costs for Maryland consumers.

“After an auto accident, consumers need all the help they can get to save money on necessary car repairs,” said Oyango Snell, state government relations counsel for PCI. “Aftermarket parts are generic affordable quality repair parts. Limiting consumers’ choice of auto repair parts takes money out of their pocketbooks.”

NSF objected to the requirement for a unique serial number on each part.

See the bill text here.

Sponsored Recommendations

ZEUS+: The Cutting-Edge Diagnostic Solution for Smart, Fast, and Efficient Auto Repairs

The new ZEUS+ simplifies your diagnostic process and guides you through the right repair, avoiding unnecessary steps along the way. It gives you the software coverage, processing...

Diagnostic Pre- and Post-scan Reports are Solid Gold for Profitability

The following article highlights the significance of pre-scans and post-scans, particularly with Snap-on scan tools, showcasing their efficiency in diagnosing issues and preventing...

Unlock Precision and Certainty: TRITON-D10 Webinar Training for Advanced Vehicle Diagnostics

The TRITON-D10 lets you dig deep into the systems of a vehicle and evaluate performance with comparative data, systematically eliminating the unnecessary to provide you with only...

APOLLO-D9: Trustworthy Diagnostics for Precision Repairs

The APOLLO-D9 provides the diagnostic information and resources you need to get the job done. No more hunting through forums or endlessly searching to find the right answers. ...

Voice Your Opinion!

To join the conversation, and become an exclusive member of Vehicle Service Pros, create an account today!